From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep  3 19:28:48 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7129A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Fri,  3 Sep 2004 19:28:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from v00058.home.net.pl (data.pl [212.85.96.58])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86E9843D1D
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Fri,  3 Sep 2004 19:28:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dot@data.pl)
Received: from localhost (HELO nonSpace) (dot.data@home@127.0.0.1)
  by matrix01.home.net.pl with SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 19:28:42 -0000
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 21:41:33 +0200
From: DOT <dot@data.pl>
To: Allan Fields <bsd@afields.ca>
Message-Id: <20040903214133.144779e2.dot@data.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20040902200556.GG34157@afields.ca>
References: <20040902200556.GG34157@afields.ca>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Can't reattach gbde slice [testing]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 19:28:48 -0000

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:05:56 -0400
Allan Fields <bsd@afields.ca> wrote:

> Can you indicate your number_of_keys parameter you are
> using in -i?  Anyone using anything other than default 4?

In both situations my device was initialized with number_of_keys set
to 1 (one).

> If using non-default please try to reproduce with number_of_keys
> set to 4.

Allright, this time I leave it unchanged and my drive works hard now. If
something happens I'll definitely let You know. Despite I'm not sure
that You should wait ;)

Michal Bartkowiak