From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Aug 13 22:00:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA23196
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA23162;
          Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 22:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708140500.WAA23162@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
Subject: Re: kern/4295: SL/IP problems between 2.2.1 & 2.2.2
Reply-To: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR kern/4295; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
To: ponds!mt.sri.com!nate, ponds!lakes.dignus.com!rivers
Cc: ponds!freebsd.org!FreeBSD-gnats-submit
Subject: Re: kern/4295: SL/IP problems between 2.2.1 & 2.2.2
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 20:45:45 -0400 (EDT)

 > 
 > >  Now - here's the _really_ interesting part - I can nfs_mount 
 > > a file system on 10.0.0.9 exported by 10.0.0.8.  ls, etc.. seem to
 > > work fine.  Telnet and FTP are the ones that hang...
 > 
 > This is almost *always* a problem with both ends not agreeing on using
 > CSLIP.  One end is using it, and the other isn't.  (UDP packets make it,
 > but TCP packets don't.)
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Nate
 > 
 
  Umm... yep, been there, done that :-) I believe I mentioned that in 
 the report...  I checked that several times before filing the report...
 
  Also - see the slattach commands; both of them have -c.
 
 	- Dave R. -