Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Jun 2021 11:58:03 +0200
From:      Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
To:        Mikhail Tsatsenko <m.tsatsenko@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: MIMEDefang limits
Message-ID:  <e9f4ef68-c44b-c8e1-b6e2-eb2f9346308f@netfence.it>
In-Reply-To: <CAGK=9AFG6TeLQ_FqTE2SumLPrAz6a%2BbXZ6NQn9LtYA6E5R3pnw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <bf2b62f5-4979-b4de-5810-3cad0a5f3d03@netfence.it> <CAGK=9AFG6TeLQ_FqTE2SumLPrAz6a%2BbXZ6NQn9LtYA6E5R3pnw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/17/21 12:46 PM, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:45 AM Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm having some problems in different sites due to MIMEDefang resource
>> limits (MX_MAX_RSS, MX_MAX_AS, etc...).
>>
>> I see the port already raises these values, in respect to the exampre
>> rc.d script, but they are still not enough for us.
>> Probably they made sense years ago, when RAM was much more scarce.
>>
>> I guess it would be a good idea to let sysadmins pick their preferred
>> values in rc.conf and I can volunteer for a patch, if you are going to
>> agree.
>>
>> Anything wrong in my reasoning?
>>
>>    bye & Thanks
>>          av.
> 
> Hello,
> That makes sense. Patches are always welcome.
> 

Thanks.

I've opened:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256711

Works for me.

  bye
	av.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e9f4ef68-c44b-c8e1-b6e2-eb2f9346308f>