From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 00:16:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E104316A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:16:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 623EE43D1F for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:16:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 28574 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2004 08:16:34 -0000 Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2004 08:16:34 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 02:16:32 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040226021524.R741@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200402260743.IAA18903@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" cc: security-team@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [is this mbuf problem real?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:16:36 -0000 On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Helge Oldach writes: > > maybe someone can comment on the status of this alert? There have been > > some comments about fixing it on freebsd-net@ but I haven't seen a CVS > > log - or I just missed it. > > It's been fixed, look for log messages about using uma for reassembly > queues. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no But not MFC'd to 4.x or the security branches yet, that is being worked on by the security officer team. Mike "Silby" Silbersack