Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 10:37:33 +0900 (JST) From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, nork@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Integrated DEBUG related macros to WITH_DEBUG/WITHOUT_DEBUG Message-ID: <200511130137.jAD1bX5G045207@sakura.ninth-nine.com> In-Reply-To: <20051113030858.4c888233@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200511130038.jAD0cgLb043746@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20051113030858.4c888233@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:08:58 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote:
> > ports/mail/dspam (but using WITH_{VERBOSE_DEBUG|BNR_DEBUG}, too)
> > ports/mail/dspam-devel (but using WITH_{VERBOSE_DEBUG|BNR_DEBUG}, too)
> --with-debug, with-verbose-debug, --with-bnr-debug are provided by the
> author and enable some some verbose logging which is much too costly to
> be used in production. Also usually you don't need to enable all three.
> This is different that an other switch GDBS (Gnu DebuGger Support) in
> my port Makefile that does CFLAGS+=-g -DDEBUG, STRIP= #
> because it helps debugging configuration problems not programming
> errors.
mail/dspam and mail/dspam-devel have no problem. Sorry,
'but' which I descripted is too bad:-(.
> > ports/mail/rabl_client
> > ports/mail/rabl_server
> Here DEBUG serves for symbols and unstripped binaries.
> I would favor a "neutral" word (!=DEBUG) for compiling debug symbols
> and not stripping binaries. The situation is similar to e.g. INVARIANTS
> and WITNESS vs. makeoptions DEBUG=-g in kernel.
I understand your feeling. However, because it provies knobs
complex, I don't agree:-(. Let's more simply! :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511130137.jAD1bX5G045207>