From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 18 09:41:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388C616A58E for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: from mailhost.tao.org.uk (tao.uscs.susx.ac.uk [139.184.131.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82D113C468 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:41:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: by mailhost.tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E2454766D; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:40:16 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:40:16 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: Gary Palmer Message-ID: <20071218094005.GA76349@transwarp.tao.org.uk> References: <20071206210848.GA63825@transwarp.tao.org.uk> <20071206215352.GA986@in-addr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071206215352.GA986@in-addr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-taoresearch-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Tao Research for more information X-taoresearch-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: joe@tao.org.uk Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -14% available on /tmp X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:41:12 -0000 On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:53:52PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:08:48PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > One of my servers is reporting: > > > > # df | grep tmp > > /dev/mirror/boot0e 507630 -64328 531348 -14% /tmp > > > > How weird is that? I wonder what is going on. > > The kernel is dated: > > > > 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #68: Mon Oct 2 14:36:13 BST 2006 > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DISK-MORE-THAN-FULL > > Not sure why its -14% rather than the more normal -8%, but I suspect thats > whats happened. > No, this is a different problem surely. The device has plenty of space. it's over empty, not over full. Joe