From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 2 16:52: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from genesis.k.pl (genesis.korbank.pl [195.117.162.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B0037B41E for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 16:51:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ns88@localhost) by genesis.k.pl (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g330m2966490 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 02:48:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ns88) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 02:47:58 +0200 From: Tomasz Paszkowski To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: natd Message-ID: <20020403004748.GA23468@genesis.k.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I'am running a preety big network (about 2k users) with a private addresses. I've been using natd + ipfw for ages and I really like it. But I've run into performance problems. Machine with PIV 1.7Ghz can't afford translating such a pig pool of connections (huge slow down of transfer). Does any one have seen any patches improving natd performacne ? I'am thinking about moving translations table to SHM and split translation process into multiple parallel process, but maybe somone have already done this ? -- _ _ _ _ _ / \ | | / / / \ / \ --- Tomasz Paszkowski ------------------------------ | |\ \| | \ \ |/ \||/ \| === IPv4://3646987138 === IPNg://3ffe:8010:88::2 === /_/ \__/ /_/ \_/ \_/ ---------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message