From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Jan 12 12:43:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ds.express.ru (ds.express.ru [212.24.32.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739F514DAA for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:43:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vova@express.ru) Received: from lanturn.kmost.express.ru ([212.24.37.109]) by ds.express.ru with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #8) id 128Ubh-0005UJ-00 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:43:05 +0300 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:43:02 +0300 (MSK) From: "Vladimir B. Grebeschikov" X-Sender: vova@lanturn.kmost.express.ru To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DUAL-brand ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <200001122003.VAA47744@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Vladimir B. Grebeschikov wrote in list.freebsd-emulation: > > Ok, I am understand it, but may be is the way to "mark" syscalls > > on point of syscall ? (while building libraries with syscalls) > > and use one, extended table of syscalls ? > > If you have the source code of the libraries (which is > necessary to "build" them), then why don't you simply > compile them for the same platform the binary is for? real situation: I have source code of linux libc (with syscalls) and source of my application that uses oracle client libraries, but I have no source of oracle libraries, in which no direct syscalls used, I hope > Regards > Oliver -- TSB Russian Express, Moscow Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message