Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:22:06 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <darius@dons.net.au> To: Isaac Waldron <waldroni@lr.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best way to lock malloc'd memory in kernel Message-ID: <XFMail.000729112206.darius@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <006301bff8fc$98795a00$0100000a@waldron.house>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29-Jul-00 Isaac Waldron wrote: > Thanks! I didn't realize that, I suppose I should have RTFM'ed a bit more > before asking, but I just kind of assumed (we all know what that does) that > memory malloc'd in kernel mode was pageable. I guess I should ask whether Yes, well it would be nice to have some kernel memory pageable but.. > that holds true for kernel modules as well, because that's what I'm actually > writing. Yes, writing a module is no different than writing for static kernel code. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000729112206.darius>