From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 8 6: 0: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hawk-systems.com (unknown [161.58.152.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A8537B402 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 05:59:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from server0 (cr901664-a.pr1.on.wave.home.com [24.112.146.66]) by hawk-systems.com (8.8.8) id GAA47202 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 06:58:10 -0700 (MST) From: "Dave VanAuken" To: Subject: RE: chroot - installs and user segregation Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 09:06:28 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20010107141218.Y95729@rfx-64-6-211-149.users.reflexco> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG been there and done that... Jail has issues sharing sysv memory resources (for obvious reasons given the logic behind the jail) and thus isn't a viable solutions for some software packages. Jail also requires a complete reconstruction o fthe underlying OS regardless if you are running a complete virtual machine, or simple an insecure or rogue process. that become a little processor and partition expensive. valid RTFm given the scope of the question posted. Jail is nice, just won't work the way I need it to. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Crist J. Clark [mailto:cjclark@reflexnet.net] Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 5:12 PM To: Dave VanAuken Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: chroot - installs and user segregation On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 09:07:42AM -0500, Dave VanAuken wrote: [snip] > Appreciate the snippets, urls, RTFM's and responses. A RTFM response. $ man jail -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message