From nobody Sun Apr 9 17:43:37 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Pvfbd1HrXz441PT; Sun, 9 Apr 2023 17:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Pvfbc3ywMz4Ckv; Sun, 9 Apr 2023 17:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1681062220; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2Jfq3V316mETz14YZnbiwvpmHHA9MkR2Ilfws3xO0uY=; b=lgj+NgU0315cPEM//DFBAPPhf4iewQOpy1WxrCFupaPXvVW8qTLS0qCTh8TbNK2aMxH9rX 4clYQkQ9INgeu/IHUA8PuyfkvAVJiCBFOrtSP++0OGNRp9grufN0q6Bt5eilwrYcWHHihN jGDMpvyba8wptsywLFdJHesYfoCL+Iu4XftXZn1Qti1c0hr4mCeCIbnB/YLCRPsQ7ZtAuw ci4IGApHZ3mDlPVV+KYTQAaVR5ogKKOYDrok62q2k22gdJex1FpgwZf/7N7PV61fYfgGgz bVBT2xkUTueZsVqnDWmJfDTDEeEAoiZjqV/UCZQ1mYMxemC5US7YPaqKKQKKFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1681062220; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2Jfq3V316mETz14YZnbiwvpmHHA9MkR2Ilfws3xO0uY=; b=wzjuQ1kXjNsdNTyqIIBvRbSBRKYTHMLikIbYT8e0U8JFH7GKBT1kKCquFfSsmRh+GJBKar n6hZX36GxfYVseYzC0ObiZQbdA03jgH/6QmfC1HT/xfNpjWPbLS2vqaTSoorbmq5FE/w4T CRI9oKZO0Pzk5gdrDdz9kL3Z3/d+KFr5qsR15t4ktaYsEfI7xuZhIp/Xa4443eONa/pGrd l5r2UX09JZMiaHC26uBcUoMfVcX4HnbM2GLXzAC87+dCvH9HtAiBzqMjQtOQFpgQGeOxJf 4jLajKkgcLBCgoEiARGCrufsRt0XOprZleUr0491iRaZI5paHRPd4Ymeztx0Ew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1681062220; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=vgWkcNUoCJO+4ctQh0adIuswtINjoIzOtQVLTvGyKxxQpuNT1nh2GZ7akkTMIwe44YdRLw UOpPFNg9TeYUlfLYBCBeQPyNJl9yi/VlltuTs/hZQcfEEJDOoPC2d6dDcx+PdFOr02tGTW OPfCDCPF3+MD8kzskzCU0ECH5ENH07VhIOyCeYnwHzy26MJ1pxbZMurdsutlNbgAECcZtc Ud/yLU1O2XNCmYB4dXdjRjlOUm9fEXcvD2ykNywzTGYFwYQXUKbr7gRAK0tQ6G1jPOo2qQ JXr7sIZOzxoiqdwFIUqA5ZTKb5kfw2DLY0bLgOTJJbUy86mectSCWRJzgvk17Q== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 7614A12A0E; Sun, 9 Apr 2023 17:43:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 16770c54b821 - main - x11-toolkits/qt5-gui: restore mesa-dri dependency until exp-run In-Reply-To: (Stephen Montgomery-Smith's message of "Sat, 8 Apr 2023 16:35:50 -0500") References: <202304072013.337KD64Z096566@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <1fc9c43f-9131-e883-d510-04cb68f37eb9@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2023 19:43:37 +0200 Message-ID: List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Stephen Montgomery-Smith writes: > On 4/7/23 22:03, Jan Beich wrote: > >> Jan Beich writes: >> >>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith writes: >>> >>>> On 4/7/23 15:13, Jan Beich wrote: >>>> >>>>> The branch main has been updated by jbeich: >>>>> -PORTREVISION= 1 >>>> >>>> >>>> PORTREVISION isn't meant to go backwards, as it messes up the upgrade >>>> process. You should have set PORTREVISION to 2, even though it was a >>>> reversion. >>> >>> Consider the upgrade as phased rollout. If you've got the new version >>> during the short window that's fine. The old version only causes fallout >>> when building in a clean environment (e.g., poudriere but has no impact >>> otherwise (e.g., portmaster). I'd like to avoid pointless rebuilds for a >>> patch that's going to re-land "as is" soon. >> poudriere has many safety checks, so a package will be rebuilt if >> it's >> newer/older than its origin, have different options, different deps, >> different prefix/suffix, etc. >> Some of this maybe relaxed by >> https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/822 > > I am using portupgrade. portupgrade behaves similar to portmaster, synth probably behaves similar to poudriere. I plan to fix all regressions which are actual bugs in the affected ports. Note, the time window after the original commit and its revert is less than 1 hour.