From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Dec  5 03:42:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA16942
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 03:42:42 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-49.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.177])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA16936
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 03:42:38 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id DAA05254; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 03:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 03:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199712051140.DAA05254@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
CC: pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co, stefan@promo.de, ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
        frankch@waru.life.nthu.edu.tw
In-reply-to: <28207.881288060@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: ports/5214: New port rasmol
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Why not just keep them separate and avoid all contraversy, eh? :-)

Because someone raised the point that there is a fair amount of
overlap between those two.  We know that will create a lot of
controversy too. :)

Oh well.  I guess ports being in two categories is better than getting 
some neuro-bioligist's or bio-chemist's hair stand on end.  This port
will go to a new category "biology" if nobody else objects.

Satoshi