From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 09:42:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B882716A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:42:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smart.eusc.inter.net (smart.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7701943D1D for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from dial-76-134.de.inter.net ([213.73.76.134] helo=current.best-eng.de) by smart.eusc.inter.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #4) id 1CQjYi-0002Dq-00; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 10:42:04 +0100 Received: from current.best-eng.de (localhost.best-eng.de [127.0.0.1]) by current.best-eng.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA79g3jS001306; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:42:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by current.best-eng.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iA79g36Z001305; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:42:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.best-eng.de: matthias set sender to msch@snafu.de using -f From: Matthias Schuendehuette Organization: Micro$oft-free Zone To: secmgr Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:42:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <02f201c4ba91$f9f95db0$33017f80@psique> <200411061217.06061.msch@snafu.de> <1099805401.4420.4.camel@emperor> In-Reply-To: <1099805401.4420.4.camel@emperor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411071042.03382.msch@snafu.de> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: msch@snafu.de List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 09:42:05 -0000 Am Sonntag, 7. November 2004 06:30 schrieb secmgr: > On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 04:16, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > Did you try to simply 'start' the plex? This works for > > initialisation of a newly created RAID5-Plex as well as for > > recalculating parity informations on a degraded RAID5-Plex. > > I did a gvinum start. No, that's not what I meant. 'gvinum start' loads the kernel module which in turn searches for vinum-GEOMs and loads the configuration data. It doesn't change the state of any gvinum item. Try 'gvinum start ' or within gvinum(8): gvinum> start This (as far as I investigated :-) a) initializes a newly created RAID5-plex or b) recalculates parity informations on a degraded RAID5-plex with a new replaced subdisk. So, a 'gvinum start raid5.p0' initializes my RAID5-plex if newly created. You can monitor the initialization process with subsequent 'gvinum list' commands. If you degrade a RAID5-plex with 'camcontrol stop ' (in case of SCSI-Disks) and 'repair' it afterwards with 'camcontrol start ', the 'gvinum start raid5.p0' (my volume here is called 'raid5') command recalculates the parity and revives the subdisk which was on disk . -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F