Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:14:18 -0500
From:      "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
To:        "fbsd" <fbsd@wbs-inc.com>, "Faisal Gillani" <fasi_74@yahoo.com>, "FreeBSD" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: ports information & removal
Message-ID:  <001d01c0ae34$27ae2330$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
References:  <000401c0ae4d$a67823a0$04036b83@terminal4> <01c101c0ae3b$87079b20$0200fea9@infowest.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 1 - When ports are installed they register in the package management
system.
> pkg_info will give you information about installed packages including
ports.
> I don't know how to distinguish which packages were installed as ports and
> which as packages other than looking in /usr/ports/distfiles for the
tarball
> or in the work directory for that port in the ports tree, but these will
not
> tell you anything if the port has been cleaned with 'make clean' and 'make
> distclean' after installation.

At this point, it doesn't really matter.  The package management system
concerns itself with *what* was installed, not *how* it was installed.
(Unlike early versions of SCO, which differentiated patches from packages
from upgrades, and relied on the user to choose the right deinstall method,
with potentially hazardous results if the wrong method was chosen..)

--
Matt Emmerton


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001d01c0ae34$27ae2330$1200a8c0>