Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:30:45 +0200
From:      Hans Ottevanger <hans@beastielabs.net>
To:        Tim Gustafson <tjg@soe.ucsc.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Using AMD with NFS Mounts
Message-ID:  <503FB155.1040201@beastielabs.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAG27QgT8o7rTtktv=JQEjMz_fSYFM_821625evt=U4SsWoGoeA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAG27QgSKtWr0gaKLO6XXO=Yp=m1bspT0iJG6J24r6u-MDk4sJw@mail.gmail.com> <201208281813.q7SIDEiJ000779@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <CAG27QgTinNfPQbn8kVocpWe5k%2BaE=CasbtNbdUdm03zbowV=FQ@mail.gmail.com> <201208291053.q7TArlAs000409@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <CAG27QgQzmvMT2jjvoEZ8wrrdodBydXpSBsjtsZ1R9gvp=EGT2Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208291209280.7395@scooby.simplesystems.org> <201208301623.q7UGNiEr006228@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <CAG27QgS5a121tWEdMpCv-tQNiSQ6pah9pryFLkyar-Vsu_Ud9g@mail.gmail.com> <20120830173636.GC2526@in-addr.com> <503FAC40.4050505@beastielabs.net> <CAG27QgT8o7rTtktv=JQEjMz_fSYFM_821625evt=U4SsWoGoeA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/30/12 20:12, Tim Gustafson wrote:
>> Both the Linux and Solaris Autofs implementations are kernel based, probably
>> to save context switches. The same is true for the FreeBSD GSoC 2006
>> "proof-of-concept" Autofs.
>
> Hrmm...does that necessarily exclude it from being a port?  Can't it
> be a loadable kernel module?
>

There are more kernel modules in ports, e.g. sysutils/fusefs-kmod, so an 
autofs kernel module in ports should not be a problem.

Kind regards,

Hans




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503FB155.1040201>