Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:30:45 +0200 From: Hans Ottevanger <hans@beastielabs.net> To: Tim Gustafson <tjg@soe.ucsc.edu> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using AMD with NFS Mounts Message-ID: <503FB155.1040201@beastielabs.net> In-Reply-To: <CAG27QgT8o7rTtktv=JQEjMz_fSYFM_821625evt=U4SsWoGoeA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG27QgSKtWr0gaKLO6XXO=Yp=m1bspT0iJG6J24r6u-MDk4sJw@mail.gmail.com> <201208281813.q7SIDEiJ000779@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <CAG27QgTinNfPQbn8kVocpWe5k%2BaE=CasbtNbdUdm03zbowV=FQ@mail.gmail.com> <201208291053.q7TArlAs000409@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <CAG27QgQzmvMT2jjvoEZ8wrrdodBydXpSBsjtsZ1R9gvp=EGT2Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208291209280.7395@scooby.simplesystems.org> <201208301623.q7UGNiEr006228@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <CAG27QgS5a121tWEdMpCv-tQNiSQ6pah9pryFLkyar-Vsu_Ud9g@mail.gmail.com> <20120830173636.GC2526@in-addr.com> <503FAC40.4050505@beastielabs.net> <CAG27QgT8o7rTtktv=JQEjMz_fSYFM_821625evt=U4SsWoGoeA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/30/12 20:12, Tim Gustafson wrote: >> Both the Linux and Solaris Autofs implementations are kernel based, probably >> to save context switches. The same is true for the FreeBSD GSoC 2006 >> "proof-of-concept" Autofs. > > Hrmm...does that necessarily exclude it from being a port? Can't it > be a loadable kernel module? > There are more kernel modules in ports, e.g. sysutils/fusefs-kmod, so an autofs kernel module in ports should not be a problem. Kind regards, Hans
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503FB155.1040201>