Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:23:59 -0400
From:      Mike Oliver <mwoliver@gmail.com>
To:        Sergey Vinogradov <boogie@lazybytes.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ifconfig output: ipv4 netmask format
Message-ID:  <BANLkTimjsfUBPNwWVQ=wCtuDZRTFM9dGCA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D9EFAC6.4020906@lazybytes.org>
References:  <4D9EFAC6.4020906@lazybytes.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 08:08, Sergey Vinogradov <boogie@lazybytes.org> wrote:
> Hi, hackers.
> I have a question: why ipv4 netmask is displayed by ifconfig in hex format?
> Isn't dot-decimal notation more human-readable? Will the attached patch
> break something in the very bad way?

Who's using IPv4 anymore?  ;-)

Seriously though, if you give a small amount of time to learning the
hex -> binary translations then you would see how convenient it is to
use hex rather than decimal when representing what are ultimately
binary numbers.

See this blog entry by Jeff Doyle...

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/how-are-your-hexadecimal-skills


-- 
Mike Oliver, KT2T
+1-863-738-2334
kt2t@arrl.net -or- mwoliver@gmail.com
Twitter: @mwoliver



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTimjsfUBPNwWVQ=wCtuDZRTFM9dGCA>