Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:16:15 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendation instead of portmanager Message-ID: <20130115011615.43a23b81@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHhngE3drKioUhB_qYuaKH5g2YtUGUXXMDWST3f_gJ26MKy__Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPkuXvFYfpO3gO8Fmpse5oBLQ4CUtGjSPerKnENXdwZ-YmZv_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHhngE3drKioUhB_qYuaKH5g2YtUGUXXMDWST3f_gJ26MKy__Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:23:08 -0800
David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Artifex Maximus
> <artifexor@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am using portmanager for updating my ports. I love its -p switch.
> > Is there any similar program with such option? I am asking because
> > portmanager is gone from ports tree.
> >
> > " -p or --pristine Updates a port if any dependency in it's
> > /var/db/pkg/{port name}/+CONTENTS
> > does not match what is installed. The effect is when
> > a
> > port is updated, any port who uses
> > the updated
> > port in it's dependency chain, no
> > matter how
> > deep, are rebuilt. Normally only
> > ports one level up are rebuilt."
> >
>
> I think "portupgrade --recursive" will do what you want.
It doesn't
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130115011615.43a23b81>