From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 08:53:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4520816A494; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (external.osdn.org.ua [212.40.34.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F3743D45; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k5N8qbal076002; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:52:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k5N8qbof075999; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:52:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from never) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:52:37 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: "R. B. Riddick" Message-ID: <20060623085236.GE13474@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20060623082209.GD13474@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20060623083838.86539.qmail@web30308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060623083838.86539.qmail@web30308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Journaling UFS with gjournal. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:53:33 -0000 Hello, R. B. Riddick! On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:38:38AM -0700, you wrote: > --- Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > Is it safe to do so on existing filesystem (if I'm using 2nd partition for > > journal)? > > > Hmm... > > Depends: > If your existing file system needs its last sector, then it wont work. If it > does not need it, then it might work (although fsck does not check for a > raw-device shrinkage - I think)... > > I say, can you make the size of ad0s1f one sector bigger with bsdlabel(8) > without changing the start sector? > I mean: Is there at least one free sector after ad0s1f? Unfortunately - no :( -- NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/