From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu May 9 19:42:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01EC158C137 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 19:42:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mozolevsky@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f46.google.com (mail-ot1-f46.google.com [209.85.210.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D0377735 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 19:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mozolevsky@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f46.google.com with SMTP id g18so3197668otj.11 for ; Thu, 09 May 2019 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lb6VOp98OIaqRZN4upLwnFRejDmIpr7ArQUXnLPL/xA=; b=qYFELkIW1cKQiVQGGtVrYehMorMuKhjeP6GGEdeMq0WIrWKzcraOP31nP8IcCaTk8i MHgzgQAV9QbZ57Fi7oFXP2Fy8LtfSoi1dfFKpVz70RQRMMDr75usdjsCART2pG/0Mg8g BsnOEhs/v7aKcSFfGoyDCwTeXvLIDvMz8W1hxFbzPX0sfXA4vOWzKrzD+fjV52gOvtri g6sKb1mHurpTyHyxGCA+2t5ymLwnY4tjjM1AU8aLiO2Vix/dNUDUp3wdjx4gooSBx4Lx wNDXOBIZGJWhzH4GIEFuLWIpqKj+YzbzfV/SFOTSMPEvso8MVBI4JLVoDVp3oxgQqKGc o2CA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVFyDy901YBo13UwQoafG53btipnUovAJZzFQQMQqY2WytnSpaW CKrLZxMRAgQwVtZIskuSKe44UfDw6GdBSOB8MGg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZHZne22OMyNcCdbl074mCyMVr7GDQroLQs2g/gilbVKQBuIBk9jEYw6dz6OWAtXUdYRIyulK/7ZVrhtuSkcM= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:739a:: with SMTP id j26mr3886370otk.242.1557430927529; Thu, 09 May 2019 12:42:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <49cfcff55fe21d5d01df916e9f9531f1@redchan.it> In-Reply-To: <49cfcff55fe21d5d01df916e9f9531f1@redchan.it> From: Igor Mozolevsky Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 20:41:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Danish FreeBSD Developer hates jews collectively To: ossobserver@redchan.it Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, misc@openbsd.org, freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A6D0377735 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mozolevsky@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mozolevsky@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[hybrid-lab.co.uk]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.89)[-0.890,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[46.210.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk,mozolevsky@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk,mozolevsky@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(-1.31)[ip: (-0.55), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.69), asn: 15169(-2.27), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 19:42:15 -0000 On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 19:07, wrote: > > Background: Apparently a FreeBSD developer, a viking looking fellow, > has been hiding a secret: just as many of his predecessors in the Danish > cities during WWII (collaborators); He has a disdain for "the jews" > collectively. Freedom of expression exists to protect the rights of others to express views one might find distasteful; for a likeable/favourable expression needs no protection---it's axiomatically welcome. When opposing views are oppressed through gross generalisation and appeal to emotion, it is a clear sign that those who oppose a particular unpalatable expression lack logical argument to oppose it. For that reason, while I might (or might not) disagree with any particular expression, I would defend their right to express their views without fear, and implore others to do same while pointing big fingers of shame at those who actively suppress or oppress fundamental human freedoms! -- Igor M.