From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Apr 22 12:00:13 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631BB5EF47B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQwwD2yppz3phS for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 13MC04wH088693 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:00:04 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: pblok@bsd4all.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 13MC00gv031863 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:00:00 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: 32-bit jail on 64-bit host To: Peter Blok References: <06CAF4FA-CBC1-4F89-9CA9-532A6B370E51@me.com> <6bf646b1-865c-be02-843a-f80f3f671eb9@grosbein.net> <0F8012C1-92F9-489E-9AAB-9131EF2360D3@bsd4all.org> Cc: Daniel Dettlaff , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <16553d95-a9f5-f0b1-4f31-1c09309b8369@grosbein.net> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:59:51 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0F8012C1-92F9-489E-9AAB-9131EF2360D3@bsd4all.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FQwwD2yppz3phS X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net does not designate 2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[eugen]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2:from]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[me.com,freebsd.org]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:00:13 -0000 22.04.2021 18:13, Peter Blok wrote: > The goal is to use p5-DBD-Oracle which only works/compiles on i386 on a very light system not able to run bhyve. > > I have tried with lib32 but it fails as well. I do not have a lot of time to debug this, so I was hoping I was able to make this work on an i386 jail. > > I’ll change the jail.conf and manage it from the outside. Hopefully it works. You do not need vnet-enabled bridged jail for the task. Simple jail will do it just fine.