Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:14:30 +0200 From: Dean Strik <dean@stack.nl> To: Chris Dionissopoulos <dionch@freemail.gr> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's wrong with netgraph NG_FWD_NEW_DATA? Message-ID: <20051017101430.GH41710@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <4353765C.4030802@freemail.gr> References: <4353765C.4030802@freemail.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--wayzTnRSUXKNfBqd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Dionissopoulos wrote: > and for every ng_eiface node you attach you must provide a > mac address for filtering (later this will be automated). [..] > gw0#ifconfig ngeth0 > ngeth0:=20 > flags=3D28943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,PPROMISC> mt= u=20 > 1500 > inet6 fe80::260:8ff:fee8:589e%ngeth0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 > inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > ether 01:02:03:04:05:00 >=20 > Traffic initiated localy flows prefectly through ngeth0 and xl0=20 > interfaces, but > this is not happen for traffic that comes from outside. It seems that=20 > doesn't > arrive to ngeth0 upper level protocols. Haven't looked at the code, but I'm just wondering here... this MAC address is a multicast address, not a unicast one. Should that work as expected at all? --=20 Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology dean@stack.nl | dean@ipnet6.org | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli --wayzTnRSUXKNfBqd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDU3mG5Td/bYnvOAMRAjvNAJ4/z0R3Cq5CgJhVqU2N759uhqet8gCgod6E tC0hJ+gua0Wqz5/vN8/kRD0= =RmpU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wayzTnRSUXKNfBqd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051017101430.GH41710>