From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 22:05:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0361065670 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from smtp.timeweb.ru (smtp.timeweb.ru [217.170.79.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BBA8FC19 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=hive.panopticon) by smtp.timeweb.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LQ7fr-0007SS-6X; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:05:19 +0300 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A05F9272; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:05:31 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 875231702D; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:05:28 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:05:28 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Florent Thoumie Message-ID: <20090122220528.GA93433@hades.panopticon> References: <539c60b90901191200n66f37c76k749ebbb829378cb9@mail.gmail.com> <367b2c980901191308l474f2d88ge7cbb860e703b737@mail.gmail.com> <367b2c980901191309k2198f14ak288590cfe9e3d320@mail.gmail.com> <20090122174455.GB20525@hades.panopticon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: Olivier SMEDTS , Steve Franks , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to install a port without install: in the Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:05:23 -0000 * Florent Thoumie (flz@xbsd.org) wrote: > > If it's just a single file, the preferred way is to add > > > > PLIST_FILES= bin/program_name > > > > to the Makefile and not use pkg-plist at all. > > No, no, no. > > This is not *preferred*. Is it not? Why? There's no reason to introduce pkg-plist for just a single file. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru