From nobody Tue Apr 12 20:12:27 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2E21AFF2D6 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from mail.punkt.de (mail.punkt.de [IPv6:2a00:b580:8000:11:1c6b:7032:35e9:5616]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KdH2T0FpZz3qcL; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from smtpclient.apple (us.hausen.com [134.209.69.223]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99D75374B7; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:12:29 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\)) Subject: Re: vtnet rxcsum broken for forwarding RELENG_13 ? From: "Patrick M. Hausen" In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:12:27 +0200 Cc: Charles Sprickman , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Kristof Provost , mike tancsa Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <11D7E62B-C51D-4A8B-AC44-DD1C5D1FA6D8@punkt.de> References: <0FE1F488-EEA5-4010-9926-2D9567E8461F@FreeBSD.org> <5A9B449D-BC3C-4D89-8AE8-7CC680B2F41E@bway.net> <322649DF-446E-4BAE-876D-D4FC47FE84B0@FreeBSD.org> <745890A5-983D-41BA-9592-D283EE800AD6@punkt.de> To: Matt Garber X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KdH2T0FpZz3qcL X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hausen@punkt.de designates 2a00:b580:8000:11:1c6b:7032:35e9:5616 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hausen@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.27 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:b580::/32:c]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.979]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[134.209.69.223:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:2a00:b580::/32, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi Matt, > Am 12.04.2022 um 22:08 schrieb Matt Garber : > This might only be specific to NAT/forwarding at this point, as I = realized my setup also involved PF NAT=E2=80=99ing on cloned loopback = interfaces for non-VNET jailed services. Definitely. If I don't use NAT, everything is "fast" in the default = configuration. Kind regards, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Kaiserallee 13a 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de info@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: J=C3=BCrgen Egeling, Daniel Lienert, Fabian = Stein