From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Mar 15 18:32:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822DC37B71A; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:32:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f2G2WgZ54833; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:32:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:32:42 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200103160232.f2G2WgZ54833@earth.backplane.com> To: Matthew Jacob Cc: John Baldwin , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal for the CPU interrupt API References: Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is this API going to disable interrupts physically or simply flag that interrupts are disabled in the per-cpu state, aka the way the old splhigh() mechanism used to? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message