From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  4 02:03:43 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: chat@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049E616A41F
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Oct 2005 02:03:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EED9443D45
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Oct 2005 02:03:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: (qmail 23758 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2005 02:03:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130)
	by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 4 Oct 2005 02:03:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 32250 invoked by uid 89); 4 Oct 2005 02:03:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98)
	by 0 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2005 02:03:39 -0000
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84AC115F6;
	Tue,  4 Oct 2005 05:03:37 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 05:03:36 +0300
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
Message-ID: <20051004050336.75006dc1@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051004044822.06e66c6a@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
References: <43410329.2080902@evildomain.org>
	<20051003232829.56d753ea@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<86mzlqiaab.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<20051004044822.06e66c6a@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>,
	Aaron Holmes <evil@evildomain.org>, chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Spam filters
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 02:03:43 -0000

On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 04:48:22 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:36 +0200
> des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote:
>=20
> > Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> writes:
> > > Aaron Holmes <evil@evildomain.org> wrote:
> > > > Any recomendations on good spam filters?
> > > Dspam [is] more accurate that spam assassin,with less resources
> > > and less work for the admin
> >=20
> > Dspam is designed to work as a local delivery agent; all email
> > addresses must map to a local user, and it delivers mail to an mbox
> > file (though there are patches to make it work with maildir).  For
> > more complex setups (IMAP server, virtual mailboxes / domains),

Just to clarify:
We've deployed a solution involving all above a week ago and some
months ago I've helped a 40k domains setup for a hosting company.

> > SpamAssassin is still the only practical alternative.

Moe mature - yes, maybe; more practical - I don't think so.

> Actually your information is outdated.
> It works very nice demonized as a content filter (LMTP/SMTP).


--=20
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"