From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 13:32:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E6716A4CE for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B8643D2F for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:32:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E7E1FF90A; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:32:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 2FA4F1FF931; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:32:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 97F75153F6; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA501539D; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:32:19 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Soren Schmidt In-Reply-To: <200312311949.hBVJnmiO083854@spider.deepcore.dk> Message-ID: References: <200312311949.hBVJnmiO083854@spider.deepcore.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ata2: spurious interrupt - status=0xff error=0xff X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:32:58 -0000 On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote: Hi, > > I have a sparc running on HEAD (one day old) and with boot_verbose set > > to 1 I get too many of those: > > > > ata2: spurious interrupt - status=0xff error=0xff > > If you have the ATA channel sharing its irq with something else, > spurious interrupts are quite normal, this does not nessesarily > mean there is something wrong.. grepping for irq on the boot log I cannot find same irqs (apart for the two 255). Could it be a problem that the only HDD is at ata3-master and nothing at ata2 ? (ata0, ata1 not present - why ever - me doesn't know that much about sparcs yet). Or does this sound to sparc specific so that I should ask for clarification on sparc64@ ? Cc: and Reply-To: set. [included again for sparc64@] Full boot log + pciconf -l -v is at http://www.zabbadoz.net/zabbadoz-network/pizza/pizza.spurious.log -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/