From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Mar 30 14:21:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from smtp05.primenet.com (smtp05.primenet.com [206.165.6.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A034A37B719 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert@usr09.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp05.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA29203; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:15:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr09.primenet.com(206.165.6.209) via SMTP by smtp05.primenet.com, id smtpdAAASia4_4; Fri Mar 30 15:15:50 2001 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA08297; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:21:38 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200103302221.PAA08297@usr09.primenet.com> Subject: Re: do we care about performance yet? To: gallatin@cs.duke.edu (Andrew Gallatin) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 22:21:37 +0000 (GMT) Cc: mjacob@feral.com, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <15044.40066.746054.729549@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> from "Andrew Gallatin" at Mar 30, 2001 09:47:30 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Sorta. And user-space CPU bound as well. The lockmgr was a somewhat > surprising standout (1.5% of the time doing a buildworld is spent in > lockmgr). This is not surprising. Benchmarking is why I didn't want to use it as if it were generally useful. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message