Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:14:25 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "J. Hellenthal" <jhell@DataIX.net> Cc: wxs@freebsd.org, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status cleanup Message-ID: <4D924BB1.30807@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103291705150.3620@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny> References: <20110319012959.GA39929@atarininja.org> <20110319013155.GB39929@atarininja.org> <20110329024441.GA24720@atarininja.org> <20110329.115900.969026047405273902.hrs@allbsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103291613570.3620@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny> <4D92444B.9010106@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103291705150.3620@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/29/2011 14:13, J. Hellenthal wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:42, dougb@ wrote: >> On 03/29/2011 13:32, J. Hellenthal wrote: >>> As for the status command in ip6addrctl Is it really needed ? >> >> Yes, it prints out the current table. >> > > Yes. I realize that. Being that their is no consumers calling status for > ip6addrctl is mainly my point in that it is not needed. I just do not > see a point in status for non-daemon rcng scripts. It's useful for actual humans. Meanwhile, thanks for voicing your opinion. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D924BB1.30807>