From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 08:06:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07C59CE; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF09A133D; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DC543BB3; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 03:06:05 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5344FF5D.8000405@marino.st> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:05:49 +0200 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: 5000 unstaged ports [was: in head/multimedia/xmms: . files] References: <201404081535.s38FZIwG078361@svn.freebsd.org> <20140409073738.GA27075@FreeBSD.org> <20140409075935.GP97416@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140409075935.GP97416@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 08:06:27 -0000 On 4/9/2014 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > We still have 5k packages not staged which are blockers for cross building for > examples or sub packages A very large portion of those have @FreeBSD.org addresses listed as MAINTAINER. I don't think it's out of line to deprecate those first, before the unmaintained ports. Has a mass email gone out to every @FreeBSD.org person with at least one unstaged port to set a near-term deadline to get the port staged? I'm happy to pull the trigger quickly but they should all be given a specific "do it soon (by this date) or else" message so they have no legs to stand on when it's complaining time. John