From nobody Tue Mar 5 04:16:32 2024 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Tpj1Y3YgCz5Bjhq for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 04:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tpj1Y2LSrz4myP for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 04:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1709612193; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=E0fmkszs+yNdz84FkEVh/YRwUyAQDZgsno8g+dGwm0A2peCcp//Nk5YxPEtQP5dha3qYJN n/Di/FS+bV8+uhG7Geyki9WmeQQ8R2+Q9kcEix2Uc0BRyNXNnc3fq/kGHK35TtEzMr+BJ2 QWgbbb4w0OUGmsUsorHphURHy3uNHubPTwXX6bAsuPlNwWN2kLl/x5iLe12iWSQtccawe6 cLjSJ5tLhhwsESu1M5phFluHGIhUl+8S8afoo97jT2wircwPJuRfGmFf2ifZxwrf4jN3Li u2z4HlVig9NUqV10Ouajo13PLtXkCAggx0WdNdn7OJUwWj6CTFNpJuqUzNC5AQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1709612193; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6Glx1rmjpUDg9MTq/jObTjMOTjd2BHvnsnrZFmnp4Ig=; b=QPBeoc7q9ltzkgETrQ+Wf+3ofY5OT8Vw4mJNoLwVreZX8biysjz98nUUVchCU1Ltw4RDOg enrmMOnZxXYqfTFjIGeErpJ6tHotsltANIPFUcVG4hQaNo1B7zG+fgvrvO8ec1Nm2AqU+r EKlahsZ/VxpKm7ftNwQff+hpiHR//z3+lypGIfTgtkpNSRM2lZYChxwnQj8O1J2uUW4dB6 S+EruDyuI0j5+ThoxEeo/2QEv0ZNCxqwafOsNFYcYVyHW+qPoBtF3zId/weG+l4tn6hB57 fBeqJkpraZ+HcJ4HAT0FwOKFp6zFAx0UNhQD9oaxAFxSS9veBImgay/TTZzEcQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tpj1Y1x7wzqQX for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 04:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4254GX5m007149 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 04:16:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4254GXZE007148 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 04:16:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277349] The net.inet.ip.source_address_validation should ignore CARP IP in backup state Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 04:16:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277349 --- Comment #5 from Gleb Smirnoff --- I'm not 100% sure there would be no unexpected consequences/regressions. The function modified isn't used by CARP only. I need to think more on that. I'd appreciate more eyes looking at code and evaluating the idea. For the reference I've found link to the discussion we had on that before, it is on Telegram, messages from https://t.me/freebsd_ru/482821 down to https://t.me/freebsd_ru/482859. The TLDR summary in English would be "seems like a good idea, but not one is 100% sure". --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=