From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 4 5:31:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC37437B408; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 05:31:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop.6bone.nl (penguin.ripe.net [193.0.1.232]) by birch.ripe.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id f84CVNG19548; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:31:23 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 22624 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:31:23 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:31:23 +0200 From: Mark Santcroos To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Junior Kernel Hacker task: improve vnode->v_tag Message-ID: <20010904143123.A534@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <20010904081337.A8968@rcfile.org> <12839.999606420@critter> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <12839.999606420@critter>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:27:00PM +0200 X-Handles: MS6-6BONE, MS18417-RIPE Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:27:00PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >I've done a /cursory/ look over how this v_tag is used. I'm not sure > >this is a simple/clean as you propose, since this is used in the > >IS_LOCKING_VFS macro, as well as in union_subr.c... > > Well, that is just too bad, because IS_LOCKING_VFS is wrong then. That's what the line of comment above it said ;) /* * [dfr] Kludge until I get around to fixing all the vfs locking. */ Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message