Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:56:37 -0800 From: "Matthew Jacob" <lydianconcepts@gmail.com> To: "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CAM_NEW_TRAN Message-ID: <7579f7fb0610290256j34523abdu93254e5ac9e65a41@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45444B14.8000102@samsco.org> References: <E1GdoR8-0007SG-Re@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <7579f7fb0610281836t4f13efcfm15c1b238cff96a7@mail.gmail.com> <7579f7fb0610281840j2ee74f5av18239d4c9c702460@mail.gmail.com> <45444B14.8000102@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Making changes that forces application changes (xmcd, cdparanoia) is > going to be hard to swallow. If they just need a recompile, that's a > lot better. Having a shim for binary compatibility would be the best. > All depends on how much work you want to put into it. > The application change is what I would want to avoid.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7579f7fb0610290256j34523abdu93254e5ac9e65a41>