From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Dec 29 21:37:37 1994
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id VAA12684 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 21:37:37 -0800
Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au [130.102.2.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA12672 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 21:37:33 -0800
Received: from cc.uq.oz.au by bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au 
          id <19619-0@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au>; Fri, 30 Dec 1994 15:37:14 +1000
Received: from netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au 
          by pandora.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.7/DEVETIR-E0.3a) with ESMTP 
          id PAA05768 for <hackers@freebsd.org>;
          Fri, 30 Dec 1994 15:39:42 +1000
Received: from localhost by netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.8.1/DEVETIR-0.1) 
          id FAA08371 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Dec 1994 05:36:58 GMT
Message-Id: <199412300536.FAA08371@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Lpr not reading printcap properly?
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5omega 10/6/94
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 1994 15:36:57 +1000
From: Stephen Hocking <sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I've noticed that the lpr program does not seem to be picking up the value of 
the mx definition. I'm still being bitten by the 1Mb limit when submitting 
files. Probably why specifying an explicit output filter did not work a while 
back either. Are there known problems with the printcap code?

   I really hate babies. Can't stand e'm. The arrogance, the lies.
   They are not to be trusted. I hate babies. - D. Schwab