From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 11 19:38:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx01-a.netapp.com (mx01-a.netapp.com [198.95.226.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681D037B73E for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:23:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from frejya.corp.netapp.com (frejya [10.10.20.91]) by mx01-a.netapp.com (8.11.1/8.11.1/NTAP-1.2) with ESMTP id g1C3Nf316765; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:23:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from cranford-be.eng (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frejya.corp.netapp.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/NTAP-1.4) with ESMTP id g1C3Nenm028028; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:23:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (kmacy@localhost) by cranford-be.eng (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g1C3NeS15892; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:23:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:23:40 -0800 (PST) From: Kip Macy To: Daniel Eischen Cc: dfr@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: to users of threads (GDB support) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > There's no reason freebsd-uthread.c has to be included in gdb. I think that there are instances when an individual wants to use the latest and greatest version of GDB and still have thread support. Even if the threads library does change, the objfile function should be able to take that into account. > That said, I think dfr and I are the only ones that have > done anything with freebsd-uthread.c, aside from obrien. > My papers are on file with FSF. I don't know about dfr. dfr is your paperwork on file? -Kip To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message