Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:22:43 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: DanielFFM@gmx.net Cc: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: My Problem Report i386/63871: Kernel Panic after 1h0m15s Message-ID: <xzp7jxu9mu4.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <25654.1078788410@www13.gmx.net> (DanielFFM@gmx.net's message of "Tue, 9 Mar 2004 00:26:50 %2B0100 (MET)") References: <25654.1078788410@www13.gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
DanielFFM@gmx.net writes: > Seems that this option is somehow new ;) Not at all, it was added three and a half years ago (2000-09-14) > Now I found it as well. So my > suggestion: If it's so important, the absence should at least generate a = big > warning - or more better an error while compiling your kernel. Its absence has absolutely no consequences for servers and desktop machines. It is a problem for laptops, however, which is why it was added to GENERIC three years ago (2000-11-15). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7jxu9mu4.fsf>