From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 09:31:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E25D16A4B3; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:31:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (guru164.netsonic.fi [194.29.193.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C9943FA3; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:31:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from vimes.int.athame.co.uk ([192.168.1.3]) by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1ABzPw-0001kl-41; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:31:32 +0300 From: Andy Fawcett To: perky@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:31:31 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310211931.31433.andy@athame.co.uk> cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: lang/python fails to portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:31:35 -0000 Sorry about the mail rather than a PR, I seem to have broken my send-pr somehow. I'll fix that next... hex# portupgrade -fr python ---> Upgrading 'python-2.3_1' to 'python-2.3.2' (lang/python) ---> Building '/usr/ports/lang/python' ===> Cleaning for python-2.3.2 ===> Extracting for python-2.3.2 >> Checksum OK for python/Python-2.3.tgz. /usr/bin/sed -e '1s,^.*$,#!/usr/local/bin/python2.3,' /usr/ports/lang/ python/work/Python-2.3/Tools/scripts/pydoc > /usr/ports/lang/python/work/ pydoc2.3 /usr/bin/sed -e '1s,^.*$,#!/usr/local/bin/python2.3,' /usr/ports/lang/ python/work/Python-2.3/Tools/scripts/idle > /usr/ports/lang/python/work/ idle2.3 ===> Patching for python-2.3.2 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for python-2.3.2 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to configure.rej >> Patch patch-configure failed to apply cleanly. >> Patch(es) patch-Modules::_sre.c applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 I can't help wondering quite why it's extracting 2.3 instead of 2.3.2, nor why there's a whole bunch of distfiles listed in the distinfo file either. ports tree is up to date, BTW. A. -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org