From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 7 04:37:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5926C16A403 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 04:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC0F43D46 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 04:37:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 5F73A312F6; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 00:37:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 00:37:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Ensel Sharon To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: UFS2 with 4TB disk _totally absurd_ X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 04:37:30 -0000 > The FDISK and bsdlabel schemes simply cannot deal with >2TB. You'll > need to either put your filesystem directly on the storage device > without and slices/labels, or use GPT to create logical partitions. 2TB filesystems are _not large_. FreeBSD should expect 2-4TB filesystems to be in common use in peoples _living rooms_, never mind in the office or datacenter. So 5.x was a total wash in terms of UFS2 and snapshots, largefiles, etc., 6.0 still doesn't have working filesystem quotas or snapshots, and it seems, doesn't support modern (circa 2004) hard drives. Maybe a little less time working on FreeBSD 23.0 ... ?