From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 21 17:22:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B370516A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:22:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7AA43D1F for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so579170wri for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:22:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=czPnaDXltYyr4cohhGDgckkfQdfutW/SIF3tf1Ahnypg4ORv772GljWVj5saSkZ0HFMcZcVMNQU8MBQ1uWoHTM+4qilaaKW/vAhMavBT6GutmnKa3V0RoTn81sKNIQ9n68+CH02PJxma7Mn4pbJ0JSTWJB9C9JQWzvQDwWSzEXk= Received: by 10.54.68.7 with SMTP id q7mr2183256wra; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.40.69 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2fd864e0504211014251b18a6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:14:41 -0700 From: Astrodog To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <4267D30E.6080902@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050419202419.GB63598@bahre.achedra.org> <20050419151900.29d0ee57.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050419214414.GD63598@bahre.achedra.org> <4267D30E.6080902@samsco.org> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: designing new freebsd server for amd64 arch X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Astrodog List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:22:42 -0000 On 4/21/05, Scott Long wrote: > Ketrien I. Saihr-Kesenchedra wrote: >=20 > [...] >=20 > > As far as advantages/disadvantages - last I'd heard, aac(4) is not 64-b= it > > clean >=20 > Just to be clear to the folks who read this list, this claim is false. > Why Ketrien likes to spread it with such strong personal authority is > beyond me, and it makes me question whether or not many of the other > things that he says are completely accurate. Sorry for lashing out > here, but gross FUD and mis-information is quite annoying. >=20 > Scott Perhaps the hardware compatibility list needs to be updated? There are still a few issues, maybe just an addendum to the i386 compat list, saying what doesn't work on AMD64, that does on i386.