Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:14:41 -0700 From: Astrodog <astrodog@gmail.com> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: designing new freebsd server for amd64 arch Message-ID: <2fd864e0504211014251b18a6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4267D30E.6080902@samsco.org> References: <Pine.OSF.4.62.0504191117280.435799@lib-eth.natur.cuni.cz> <d8e41c542eabf33e84258cb134360ba4@khera.org> <20050419202419.GB63598@bahre.achedra.org> <20050419151900.29d0ee57.kgunders@teamcool.net> <20050419214414.GD63598@bahre.achedra.org> <4267D30E.6080902@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/21/05, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > Ketrien I. Saihr-Kesenchedra wrote: >=20 > [...] >=20 > > As far as advantages/disadvantages - last I'd heard, aac(4) is not 64-b= it > > clean >=20 > Just to be clear to the folks who read this list, this claim is false. > Why Ketrien likes to spread it with such strong personal authority is > beyond me, and it makes me question whether or not many of the other > things that he says are completely accurate. Sorry for lashing out > here, but gross FUD and mis-information is quite annoying. >=20 > Scott Perhaps the hardware compatibility list needs to be updated? There are still a few issues, maybe just an addendum to the i386 compat list, saying what doesn't work on AMD64, that does on i386.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2fd864e0504211014251b18a6>