Date: 21 Jan 2002 16:48:00 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: markm@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pam_opie(8) prompt Message-ID: <xzpg04zwvrj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <xzpk7ubwvve.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzpelkjyeh3.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121142901.GA36594@nagual.pp.ru> <20020121150716.GA36954@nagual.pp.ru> <xzp1ygjybwt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121152134.GA37234@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpk7ubwvve.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes: > The bug is quite simply that pam_opie(8) never sets the AUTHTOK item, > so pam_unix(8) doesn't know that the user already entered a password. > > I believe pam_get_pass() should set PAM_AUTHTOK. Any objections? OK, now I'm really off my rocker; pam_conv_pass() (called by pam_get_pass()) does set PAM_AUTHTOK. I still don't understand why it's NULL by the time pam_unix(8) calls pam_get_pass(). I'll investigate further. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg04zwvrj.fsf>