From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 11 14:21:12 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E134F1EC
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qa0-f45.google.com (mail-qa0-f45.google.com
 [209.85.216.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5748306
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id g10so1186921qah.11
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:21:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
 :subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=Glm8sY/mDhKpZTWUCiEYdhZNXQ6elmGkuzfK/TTmWxM=;
 b=sCaoiZZqaaizqtCdzWJ2TnQUoOAbNYslNftd56EDop70ri/SoibRxNZv0guaHPVFup
 yhfa1WNa7DLRLmrMhyBZEdaYg2gFVx5JfPdbWzZWU4sX8znhySrHWYzyQLpi2H32fUYn
 3jKndtlWkigS1Pt8J6XKKAC23cWXkLekKQczmI5oIFxjyCQrdfp2Yv8SiSzg9jcZTmIz
 m0nVnM+EjjZK1u08BH/RCivvqHZesGT9l8+ht9mLoCJ5fM+flhZfjsQZH/8FwEZ24uM1
 57gJKy0nbipIDUNKbebBYIzUoqkZiiEehnslO0pFS5hB7QXS47CPKgiLQnQadyZC7Eab
 AfLA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.186.81 with SMTP id cr17mr5465382qab.99.1360592466241;
 Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:21:06 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: OqUeRuGKmZVn8R89ZB-qK9snOpw
Message-ID: <CAFYkXjk+uP=Y=x1dsbORcWuH8N7sAy4Zc1Zbb6GXhFjsG2BUnw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: how much reliable is UFS2+SU/J
From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:21:12 -0000

Hello :-)

Some time ago I have switched to UFS2+SU/J. However on a crash I have
found some issues on a /home partition that SU/Journal seems to have
missed. This caused applications to misbehave or use default
configuration. Running "fsck" showed that filesystem is clean, but
running "fsck -fy" found some issues. This happended at least three
times in a short period of time, so I started to wonder how much
reliable if UFS2+SU/J? Should I expect some fixes in this area or
thing will stay like this forever for UFS2+SU/J?

Best regards :-)
Tomek

-- 
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info