From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 22:30:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A791065672 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028528FC13 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBIMUAOe085091 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBIMUAEv085089; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:30:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:30:10 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201012182230.oBIMUAEv085089@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Cran Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB3B106566C for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from red.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C188FC12 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from red.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBIMMBv3069948 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:22:11 GMT (envelope-from nobody@red.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by red.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBIMMB3J069947; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:22:11 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <201012182222.oBIMMB3J069947@red.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:22:11 GMT From: Bruce Cran To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1 Cc: Subject: ports/153284: sysutils/fio should be in the benchmarks category, not sysutils X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:30:11 -0000 >Number: 153284 >Category: ports >Synopsis: sysutils/fio should be in the benchmarks category, not sysutils >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 18 22:30:10 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Bruce Cran >Release: N/A >Organization: >Environment: N/A >Description: The fio benchmark tool sysutils/fio (http://git.kernel.dk/?p=fio.git;a=summary) should be under benchmarks, not sysutils. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: