From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  8 22:17:43 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCD4106568F;
	Mon,  8 Feb 2010 22:17:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca)
Received: from esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca
	[131.104.91.36])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A188E8FC2B;
	Mon,  8 Feb 2010 22:17:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEALMbcEuDaFvJ/2dsb2JhbADXHIRUBA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,432,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="64833033"
Received: from ganges.cs.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.91.201])
	by esa-annu-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2010 17:17:41 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ganges.cs.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7F8FB808C;
	Mon,  8 Feb 2010 17:17:41 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ganges.cs.uoguelph.ca
Received: from ganges.cs.uoguelph.ca ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ganges.cs.uoguelph.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id vJOpihBQ2MjL; Mon,  8 Feb 2010 17:17:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.102])
	by ganges.cs.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A97FB8039;
	Mon,  8 Feb 2010 17:17:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rmacklem@localhost)
	by muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	o18MSvt17944; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:28:57 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca: rmacklem owned process doing
	-bs
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:28:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
X-X-Sender: rmacklem@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca
To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <4B704804.4030802@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1002081727400.17410@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References: <4B6FE550.9020506@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<Pine.GSO.4.63.1002081001390.25952@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
	<4B704804.4030802@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFSv4: mount -t nsf4 not the same as mount_newnfs?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:17:43 -0000



On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:

>> 
>> Oh, and you should set:
>>     sysctl vfs.newnfs.locallocks_enable=0
>> in the server, since I haven't fixed the local locking yet. (This implies
>> that apps/daemons running locally on the server won't see byte range
>> locks performed by NFSv4 clients.) However, byte range locking between
>> NFSv4 clients should work ok.
>> 
>
> Interesting, I see a lot of vfs.newfs-stuff on server-side, but not this 
> specific OID. Do I miss something here?
>

Oops, make that vfs.newnfs.enable_locallocks=0

rick