From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 5 15:28:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (dhcp45-25.dis.org [216.240.45.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA71D37B401 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f75MUu100891; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:30:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200108052230.f75MUu100891@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: John Polstra Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, dillon@earth.backplane.com Subject: Re: Page Coloring In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Aug 2001 12:17:52 PDT." <200108051917.f75JHqn34961@vashon.polstra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 15:30:56 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Yes, I understand that. I'm just trying to find out why Mike keeps > saying we cannot determine the processor cache characteristics at > runtime. Because I believed we couldn't. It appears I'm wrong. 8) The only question left really then is whether it's worth actually trying = to tune for cache size, or if our defaults are good enough, whether we = shouldn't just keep them as they are... -- = =2E.. every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message