From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 19 04:12:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA20771 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 04:12:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA20767; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 04:12:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA18173; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 15:11:31 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 15:11:29 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Dmitrij Tejblum cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble In-Reply-To: <199801191008.NAA01615@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > [CC list trimmed] > > Андрей Чернов wrote: > > I repeat (already many > > times) that both new and old patch handle Index: equally. > > I don't believe it. From src/contrib/patch/NEWS: > > Changes in version 2.4: > [...] > * The method used to intuit names of files to be patched is changed again: > `Index:' lines are normally ignored for context diffs, > [...] Better check than spread rumors, don't be lazy and run some tests at least. To be precise I mean "the stuff related to Index: lines" handled equally in 2.1 and 2.5 patch versions. I mean _original_ GNU versions, not modified in FreeBSD. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/