From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 2 03:37:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D4716A508 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 03:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qingli@speakeasy.net) Received: from webmail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (webmail2.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82F443D79 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 03:37:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qingli@speakeasy.net) Received: (qmail 16189 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2006 03:37:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO webmail2) ([127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender ) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Aug 2006 03:37:05 -0000 Received: from 12.178.37.11 (unverified [12.178.37.11]) by webmail2 (VisualMail 4.0) with WEBMAIL id 11007; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:37:05 +0000 From: "Qing Li" To: "Yar Tikhiy" , "Qing Li" Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mintersoft VisualMail, Build 4.0.111601 X-Originating-IP: [12.178.37.11] Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:37:05 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, sam@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_vlan.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:37:19 -0000 > > Removing the "dead" assignment to evl->evl_encap_proto above and > reducing the bcopy window by 2 bytes here is a nano-optimization. > Which is worse, it smuggles hidden dot1q details in this otherwise > encapsulation-neutral block of code. E.g., I could use the former > code for both dot1q and ISL privately by just redefining > ETHER_VLAN_ENCAP_LEN. > You are right. > > Grand total: I would greately appreciate if you backed out this > change and then fixed the tag value of -1 alone, but let me review > that first. Thanks! > Okay. Thanks, -- Qing