From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 16 15:47:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA07781 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 15:47:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA07623; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 15:46:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27881; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 15:45:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199802162345.PAA27881@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: Terry Lambert cc: se@FreeBSD.ORG (Stefan Esser), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI LKM Drivers ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Feb 1998 23:42:27 GMT." <199802162342.QAA10261@usr05.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 15:45:50 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In any case, the kld code implements a kernel link-loader, which > cleans up these issues significantly. This is probably where any > module work should be targetted. > Thats fine, I think we are just looking for a mechanism to dynamically load PCI devices whether is lkm or kld is not a big concern right now for neither supports what we want --- that is to load dynamically a PCI driver. Tnks, Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message