From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Sep 19 09:31:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA22678 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 09:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shadows.aeon.net (shadows.aeon.net [194.100.41.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA22338 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 09:26:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bsdchat@localhost) by shadows.aeon.net (8.8.7/8.8.3) id TAA23750; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 19:21:42 +0300 (EET DST) From: mika ruohotie Message-Id: <199709191621.TAA23750@shadows.aeon.net> Subject: Re: uptime on hub.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from The Hermit Hacker at "Sep 17, 97 10:03:25 am" To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 19:21:41 +0300 (EET DST) Cc: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de, chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > 11:42AM up 100 days, 14:29, 10 users, load averages: 0.41, 0.44, 0.47 > 10:01AM up 279 days, 19:56, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 just think about all those bugs and security holes in both systems... starting from procfs thing. i prefer my machines up to date, since rebooting new kernel takes machine off for just a minute or two. mickey