Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 20:45:23 +0300 (EEST) From: Adrian Penisoara <ady@warpnet.ro> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports tree FROZEN until 2000 PST July 21st Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980721203734.1031A-100000@ady.warpnet.ro> In-Reply-To: <19980721192758.A20992@klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, 21 Jul 1998, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > * PS: whoops, mail/imap-uw needs an upgrade too, they released imap-uw-4.2 > > * yesterday... Another deadline, Asami ? > > > > That's too late. ;) > > I hate to say this, but I saw a notice on bugtraq, that earlier versions > have security problems. If I remember right 4.2 was strongly suggested. > Perhaps this time an exception because of security ? Nothing to worry about -- we already use the final post- rootexploit version of the imap server; if you'll take a look at the freebsd-ports mailing list archive you'll see a thread with the "imap-uw security hole -- please update port" subject which was the "firestarter" :) Observe that MASTER_SISTES for this port begins with Steve's homepage -- there you'll find the "FINAL" version of imap-uw, dated just 1 week before the newly released 4.2 and some time after the bugtraq advisory & the Pine 4.00 "warning" from the Pine Team. I'm just sorry we couldn't have the "lastest greatest" imap-uw package for the 2.2.7-RELEASE CDROM... my fault... > > -- > Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas > What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? > http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html > "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' > Thanks, Ady (@freebsd.ady.ro) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980721203734.1031A-100000>