From owner-freebsd-hardware  Wed Jan 10 12:49:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-hardware
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA00817
          for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 12:49:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA00785
          for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 12:48:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uucp5.UU.NET by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP 
	id QQzxyp18942; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 15:48:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from uanet.UUCP by uucp5.UU.NET with UUCP/RMAIL
        ; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 15:48:45 -0500
Received: by crocodil.monolit.kiev.ua; Wed, 10 Jan 96 22:47:02 +0200
Received: (from dk@localhost) by dog.farm.org (8.6.11/dk#3) id UAA18539 for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 20:31:29 +0200
From: Dmitry Kohmanyuk <dk@dog.farm.org>
Message-Id: <199601101831.UAA18539@dog.farm.org>
Subject: anyone there using AMD's 133MHz chips?
To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 18:31:29 +0000 ()
Reply-To: dk+@ua.net
X-Class: Fast
X-OS-Of-Choice: FreeBSD 2.0.5-RELEASE
X-NIC-Handle: DK379
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22 dk9]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

are there any problems/opinions on them?  It is worth to choose them
over 120MHz ones?  (i.e., time make world on both)